Preventing Cognitive Decline

Preventing Cognitive Decline

Linas Juozenas
Skip to article

Intelligence Unleashed · Cognitive ageing

Protect the brain without promising immunity

Movement, food, learning, sleep and medical care all matter—but not in the simplistic way “reverse brain ageing” headlines suggest. This guide separates what supports health, what improves a test score and what has actually been shown to change dementia risk.

Risk reduction, not certaintyTrials in plain EnglishFood before supplementsA sustainable action plan
Protect health nowMany useful actions earn their place through cardiovascular, metabolic, functional or mental-health benefits.
Read outcomes preciselyA better practised test, a scan difference and fewer dementia diagnoses are not interchangeable.
Keep agency intactRisk reflects biology and social conditions as well as choices. No one causes or deserves dementia.

Evidence reviewed 4 September 2026 · General education, not an individual diagnosis or treatment plan

01

First principles

Define the promise before choosing the habit

Dementia is not ordinary forgetfulness and it is not an inevitable part of ageing. It is an umbrella term for impairment severe enough to interfere with daily life, caused by several diseases and injuries; mixed causes are common.1

“Prevention” sounds binary. The evidence supports a narrower promise: across populations, changing some exposures and treating some conditions may reduce average risk or delay onset. Age, genes, chance, biology, opportunity, environment and access to care still matter. A diagnosis is never proof of personal failure.

Healthy in its own rightAn action improves fitness, blood pressure, sleepiness, mood, nutrition, hearing or daily function—even if dementia effects remain unknown.
Associated with riskPeople with an exposure later have different outcomes. Useful evidence, but confounding and reverse causation can remain.
Changes a measureA trial improves a cognitive composite, trained task, biomarker or scan. That does not automatically mean better daily life.
Changes clinical diseaseA well-designed trial shows fewer cases or later onset of MCI or dementia. This is the outcome bold prevention claims require.

The World Health Organization’s 2026 guideline recommends action across health behaviours, medical conditions, social and cognitive activity, hearing and environmental exposure, while repeatedly grading uncertainty and distinguishing strong from conditional advice.2 The 2024 Lancet Commission estimated that 14 potentially modifiable factors collectively account for about 45% of dementia cases worldwide.3

What 45% does not mean: it is a population-attributable estimate built from observed associations and assumptions about causality and complete removal of exposures. It is not the percentage of one person’s risk under their control, not a forecast that 45% of cases will disappear, and not the expected benefit from a checklist.

Normal ageing can include slower recall. Persistent change that disrupts finances, medication, navigation, language, safety or familiar tasks deserves assessment. Sudden confusion is urgent: infection, stroke, medication effects and other treatable problems can resemble decline. Evaluation can identify contributors and open support and planning.4

02

The whole landscape

Risk accumulates across a life—not inside one “brain food”

Think in life courses, not miracle ingredients: learning, vascular health, sensory access, relationships, environment and injury protection interact.

Earlier lifeBuild foundationsEquitable education, safe development and opportunities to keep learning contribute to cognitive reserve. These are social investments, not tests of individual virtue.
MidlifeReduce accumulated burdenHearing loss, high LDL cholesterol, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, depression, smoking, inactivity, harmful alcohol and head injury are major practical targets.
Later lifePreserve access and functionSocial isolation, air pollution and untreated vision loss join continuing vascular, sensory, cognitive and physical needs. Frailty and unintended weight loss change priorities.

The stages are not rigid. WHO’s evidence review also shows why a neat risk map is not a map of equal proof: recommendations range from strong to conditional, several with low or very-low certainty.5

Clinical

Measure what is treatable

Review blood pressure, lipids, glucose, medicines, hearing, vision, mood, sleep symptoms and nutrition with appropriate professionals. Treat conditions for their established health benefits.

Behavioural

Make the healthy option livable

Build movement, nourishing food, learning, connection, tobacco cessation and lower alcohol exposure around ability, culture, pleasure, cost and routine.

Structural

Change the conditions

Clean air, safe streets, affordable food, education, income, accessible care and inclusive community spaces shape who can act. Risk reduction is also public policy.

No one can optimise away deprivation, unsafe work or inaccessible care. When recommendations compete for limited resources, prioritise the clearest immediate benefit and clinical need.

03

High-value foundations

Start with health care, not a supplement aisle

The brain depends on circulation, metabolism, sensation and safety. Start with established needs, not a proprietary “neuroprotective” stack.

Practical priorities and the claim each can honestly support
Priority What to do Why it belongs What not to claim
Blood pressure, diabetes and lipids Measure, review and manage to personalised clinical targets; avoid dizziness, falls and hypoglycaemia. Strong cardiovascular and stroke-prevention rationale; possible cognitive-risk benefit. There is no universal “brain” target or proof that more intensive is always better.
Tobacco and alcohol Use evidence-based cessation support. Reduce harmful alcohol exposure; do not start drinking for health. Benefits cancer, vascular, respiratory and injury risk as well as the broader dementia-risk profile. Wine is not a treatment, and an observational J-curve does not prove protection.
Hearing and vision Seek assessment; use aids or treatment based on sensory need, preference and clinical indication. Communication, safety and function improve; cognitive evidence is promising but not universal. Glasses, hearing aids or cataract surgery do not guarantee dementia prevention.
Weight and nutrition Address midlife obesity when appropriate; preserve muscle and investigate unintentional later-life loss. Supports metabolic health, mobility and adequate nutrition. Lower weight is not always better, and rapid loss is not a cognitive therapy.
Head and fall protection Use seatbelts, sport and work protection, fall-risk review, strength and balance support. Prevents injuries with immediate, sometimes life-changing consequences. No helmet or balance programme erases earlier injury risk.

Newer genetic and longitudinal analyses offer no sound reason to prescribe alcohol for cognitive health. Apparent benefits of light drinking can arise when former drinkers are grouped with abstainers or when early illness causes people to drink less; harmful use clearly carries risks.6

In ACHIEVE, a hearing intervention did not slow three-year cognitive decline across all 977 adults. A prespecified higher-risk cardiovascular subgroup showed 48% less decline; healthier volunteers did not.7 That subgroup result is encouraging, not universal. Treat hearing loss because communication and participation matter now; regard risk reduction as possible.

When not to self-optimise

Seek prompt help for progressive cognitive or functional change; seek urgent care for sudden confusion, weakness, facial droop, speech difficulty, severe headache, collapse or rapid illness. Apps and wearables cannot diagnose the cause.

04

Movement

Move for health, function and enjoyment—not a biomarker

Physical activity improves health on many fronts. Its dementia-specific evidence is less precise than headlines imply.

For general health, WHO advises 150–300 minutes of moderate aerobic activity a week, or 75–150 vigorous, or an equivalent mix, plus strength work on at least two days. Older adults should add varied balance-and-strength activity on at least three days when able. Any activity is better than none.8 These are general-health targets, not a proven dementia-prevention dose.

Aerobic

Walking, wheeling, cycling, swimming or dancing can build endurance. Use a pace that is safe and repeatable; conversation effort is often easier to judge than a formula.

Strength

Weights, bands, machines, bodyweight or functional lifting support muscle, bone, glucose handling and independence. Progress technique and load gradually.

Balance

Tailored balance and functional practice can reduce falls. Support may be needed when vision, neuropathy, dizziness or previous falls raise risk.

Less sitting

Replace some sedentary time with movement of any intensity. There is no science-set maximum sitting time or mandatory 30-minute break rule.

A 2024 analysis of 104 longitudinal studies found only a very small association between activity and later impairment after bias correction, no dose–response, and no significant association beyond ten years.9 A 2023 umbrella review of randomised trials found that apparent cognitive benefits became negligible after adjusting for active controls, baseline differences and publication bias.10 Other syntheses find modest domain gains: “may help” is reasonable; “reverses decline” is not.

A famous finding, correctly framed

The “2% larger hippocampus” result was one study, not a prescription

A 2011 trial of 120 older adults reported about 2% greater anterior hippocampal volume after one year of aerobic training. A later meta-analysis of eight trials found no significant pooled volume effect or relationship with fitness change.11 One scan result is not a promise that exercise “regrows” memory.

EXERT randomised 296 sedentary adults with amnestic MCI to aerobic exercise or low-intensity stretching, balance and mobility—not an aerobic-plus-resistance package. Cognition was stable in both groups at 12 months, without a significant difference. A nonrandomised outside comparison cannot prove prevention.12

Movement still has a compelling safety and function story. A Cochrane review of 108 trials found exercise reduced falls in community-dwelling older people, particularly through balance and functional programmes.13 Start below your ceiling and seek guidance for unstable symptoms, significant pain, falls or complex conditions.

05

Food and supplements

Choose a nourishing pattern; retire the “superfood” script

Plant-forward, minimally processed food supports general health. Mediterranean and MIND patterns are templates, not proven dementia shields.

A 2025 meta-analysis of 23 observational studies associated higher Mediterranean-diet adherence with lower risks of cognitive impairment, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.14 Adherents may also differ in education, income, activity, smoking, care and early disease. Adjustment cannot remove every difference.

Build more often

A flexible food-first pattern

  • Vegetables and fruit in forms that are affordable and usable
  • Beans, lentils, whole grains, nuts and seeds as tolerated
  • Fish or other suitable protein sources
  • Unsaturated oils in place of some saturated fats
  • Water and low-sugar drinks; meals that preserve pleasure and culture
Limit thoughtfully

Reduce burden, not joy

  • Frequent ultra-processed foods high in salt, free sugars or saturated fat
  • Processed meat and excessive portions of red meat
  • Heavy alcohol exposure
  • Rigid restriction that worsens frailty, appetite or food anxiety
  • Expensive ingredients marketed as neurologically essential

In the largest dedicated MIND trial, 604 at-risk adults received MIND plus mild calorie restriction or an equally intensive control diet. After three years, cognition and MRI outcomes did not differ significantly.15 A PREDIMED substudy found suggestive cognitive benefits from Mediterranean diets plus olive oil or nuts, but involved 447 people at one site and did not show fewer dementia cases.16

WHO’s 2026 position: do not use vitamins B or E, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, or multivitamin/mineral supplements specifically to prevent cognitive decline or dementia when no deficiency has been diagnosed. The guideline judged that evidence of benefit did not outweigh potential unexpected harms.

Capsules do not inherit the associations of a whole diet. In VITAL-Cog, 1 gram a day of marine omega-3 did not improve cognition over two to three years.17 COSMOS found a small average multivitamin advantage—about 0.07 standard deviations for global cognition across three substudies from one parent trial—but no demonstrated reduction in MCI or dementia. The popular “two years younger” description is a model-based comparison with age-related test differences, not rejuvenation or extra disease-free years.18

Correcting a documented deficiency is medical care, not a prevention stack. Supplements can interact or harm. Ask whether the exact product changed a meaningful clinical outcome and was independently replicated.

06

Cognitive activity

Practise skills without confusing practice with protection

Training can improve the ability practised. Transfer to everyday cognition or dementia risk is less certain.

For people with MCI, the American Academy of Neurology concluded that six months of exercise is likely to improve cognitive measures and cognitive training may improve them; it found no high-quality evidence supporting drug treatment at the time of its guideline.19 WHO 2026 similarly makes conditional recommendations for cognitive training and stimulation, with low or very-low certainty and no established optimal format or dose.

MeaningChoose a skill or project worth doing even without a prevention claim.
NoveltyAdd a new technique, vocabulary, route, rhythm or role.
ChallengeWork near—but not continually beyond—your current ability.
FeedbackUse a teacher, peer, rehearsal, result or practical output.
TransferApply the skill in real contexts rather than only repeating one screen.

ACTIVE enrolled 2,832 independent older adults. Ten sessions produced gains mainly in the abilities trained; reasoning and speed effects remained at ten years, while memory-test effects did not. Training groups reported less difficulty with instrumental daily activities, although attrition and self-report complicate interpretation.20

A 2026 follow-up linked Medicare claims for 2,021 participants. No randomised arm had a significant main effect on diagnosed dementia. Speed trainees who completed a later booster had fewer diagnoses, but booster completion was post-randomisation and may mark healthier, more engaged people.21 This is a signal for one speed protocol, not proof for brain games generally.

Broad reviews find reliable improvement on practised tasks but weak or inconsistent “far transfer” to unrelated abilities and daily life.22 Commercial claims can outrun even that evidence: the US Federal Trade Commission settled charges that Lumosity had made unsupported claims about reducing or delaying age-related cognitive impairment and other conditions.23

A better invitation: choose a meaningful skill for novelty, mastery, purpose or connection, and increase challenge gradually. No hobby is a proven “frontal–hippocampal activator.”

07

Sleep, mood and connection

Treat present needs; keep prevention claims proportionate

Sleep, mood, stress and connection affect thinking today. Their relationship with later dementia is complex and may run both ways.

Sleep

Disrupted sleep is associated with later cognitive problems, but early brain change can also disturb sleep. Prevention trials remain insufficient.

Mood and stress

Depression can impair attention, memory and self-care, and may be a risk, consequence or early signal. Treat it for wellbeing; prevention is unproved.

Connection

Social engagement is associated with better outcomes, but causality, amount and quality remain uncertain. Chosen connection beats a quota.

In the Whitehall II cohort, persistent sleep of six hours or less in midlife was associated with later dementia.24 This is observational, not proof that longer sleep prevents disease. Clearance is a plausible research pathway; “eight hours clears amyloid” is not a human treatment claim.

Loud snoring, witnessed pauses or gasping, marked daytime sleepiness and morning headaches can signal obstructive sleep apnoea and deserve assessment.25 Treat apnoea for established health reasons; prevention remains uncertain. Review pain, medicines, alcohol, shift work, caregiving and environment rather than blaming discipline.

Mindfulness, relaxation, time outdoors or biofeedback may help some people with stress. A meta-analysis in subjective cognitive decline or MCI found short-term improvements in anxiety, perceived stress and quality of life, but not stress biomarkers—and it did not establish dementia prevention.26 Claims that mindfulness protects dendritic spines by lowering cortisol turn a possible mechanism into a clinical certainty.

Act on present needs: persistent low mood, anxiety, loneliness, insomnia or sleepiness deserve help because wellbeing, safety and function matter now.

08

Multidomain programmes

The trials are encouraging—and smaller than the headlines

Combining sensible targets is pragmatic. Bundled trials cannot reveal which ingredient mattered or prove synergy without a factorial design.

FINGER
Finland

1,260 people2 yearseffect size 0.13 Adults aged 60–77 at elevated risk received intensive diet, exercise, cognitive training and vascular monitoring or regular health advice. The cognitive composite rose in both groups; the between-group difference in slope was 0.022 standard deviations per year. Executive function and processing speed favoured intervention, while the prespecified memory domain did not.27 The famous “25% more improvement” is the relative difference between small changes—not 25% fewer dementia cases.

US POINTER
United States

2,111 people2 years+0.029 SD/year At-risk adults aged 60–79 received structured or self-guided versions of the same domains. Global cognition improved 0.243 SD per year in the structured arm and 0.213 in the self-guided arm—a statistically significant difference of 0.029 SD per year, about 0.058 SD over two years.28 Both groups were active interventions, practice effects contributed to improvement, and clinical significance, durability and dementia incidence remain unknown.

LatAm-FINGERS
Latin America

1,065 people11 countries+0.11 SD/year A culturally adapted structured programme outperformed flexible health advice on a cognitive composite over two years.29 This supports feasibility and test-score benefit. “55% greater improvement” is a ratio of score changes, not 55% lower dementia risk.

MAPT
France

1,680 people3 yearsneutral primary tests Omega-3, a multidomain programme, both, or placebo were compared. No primary comparison significantly improved the cognitive composite after correction for multiple testing, and omega-3 alone was essentially null.30 The combined point estimate looked approximately additive, not more-than-additive evidence of synergy.

preDIVA
Netherlands

3,526 people6.7-year medianHR 0.92 Nurse-led vascular risk management did not significantly reduce dementia versus usual care: 6.5% versus 7.0%, hazard ratio 0.92 (95% CI 0.71–1.19). Cognition, disability, cardiovascular events and mortality also did not differ.31 Already-good usual care may have left little contrast, but a neutral trial remains neutral.

A 2021 synthesis of multidomain trials found a small cognitive-test advantage but no significant reduction in incident dementia.32 FINGER follow-up reported a randomised difference through year seven; later engagement comparisons were observational and vulnerable to healthy-adherer and attrition bias.33 As of this review, these programmes have not established that they prevent dementia.

What the trials justify: structured support can help selected at-risk adults make coordinated changes and slightly improve cognitive composites. They do not justify a DIY promise of “reversal” or multiplying effects.

09

Biology without theatre

Plausible pathways are not clinical outcomes

A mechanism justifies study; it does not establish a durable human benefit.

Vascular and metabolic pathways

Activity, food, tobacco cessation and care affect vascular risks. Vascular injury often coexists with neurodegeneration, making this a credible pathway.

Plasticity and reserve

Learning can alter performance and neural recruitment. “Reserve” describes resilience; it is not a tank a hobby fills or a scan reads.

Neurotrophic and immune signalling

Exercise may influence BDNF, inflammatory signalling and other pathways. Blood BDNF is not a direct meter of brain BDNF, synapse count or new human neurons.

Sleep and clearance

Sleep supports memory and homeostasis. Human evidence does not show that a prescribed duration clears a promised amount of amyloid.

Watch verbs cross the laboratory-to-headline gap: “may influence” becomes “boosts,” and association becomes protection. Ask: In whom? Compared with what? Measured how? For how long?

A useful translation rule

Do not let a biomarker do the work of a diagnosis

Lower homocysteine is not fewer cases. Peripheral BDNF is not neurogenesis. Hippocampal volume is not guaranteed memory. A cognitive composite is not necessarily preserved daily independence. Name the outcome measured.

10

From evidence to action

Build a plan that can survive ordinary life

Make the next useful action safe and repeatable, then add support where barriers are greatest.

  1. Clarify the starting pointList current conditions, medicines, symptoms, falls, sensory needs, food access, movement capacity, sleep and what already brings meaning.
  2. Choose one anchorSelect the change with the clearest immediate value: a health appointment, tobacco support, a walk, a meal pattern, hearing care or a class.
  3. Add structurePut it in the calendar, remove one obstacle, invite a partner, arrange transport or professional guidance, and define the smallest viable version.
  4. Review and extendAfter several weeks, assess safety, consistency and daily benefit. Keep, adapt or replace it; then add the next domain if capacity allows.
A practical plan: action, support and a meaningful measure
Domain A useful first action Support that may help Track this—not “brain age”
Clinical Book an appropriate review of blood pressure, metabolic risks, medicines, mood, hearing or vision. Written questions, interpreter, medication list, family member by consent. Appointment completed; agreed treatment understood; symptoms or adverse effects reviewed.
Movement Add a comfortable repeatable bout and one strength or balance exercise suited to ability. Physiotherapist, trainer, walking or wheeling partner, accessible venue. Minutes or sessions; effort; falls; pain; confidence; daily function.
Food Add one vegetable, pulse, whole grain, nut or appropriate protein to a familiar meal. Dietitian for medical needs; delivery, community meals, culturally relevant recipes. Meals prepared; food security; appetite; energy; unintended weight change.
Learning Choose one meaningful skill with progressive challenge and feedback. Teacher, library, peer, accessible interface, adapted materials. Attendance, completed projects, confidence and real-world use.
Sleep and connection Address a specific sleep symptom or make one chosen, low-pressure contact. Clinician, therapy, peer group, transport, hearing access, carer respite. Sleepiness, distress, enjoyment, belonging and whether contact is wanted.

A five-minute start may suit someone rebuilding after illness. Malnutrition may require energy and protein, not restriction; loneliness may require transport or hearing support before a group. Personalisation changes the route.

Do not use frequent cognitive self-testing as a progress meter. Scores move with practice, sleep, mood, illness, device conditions and normal variability; repeated checking can also increase anxiety. Track behaviours and life outcomes. Let a qualified assessment answer a clinical question.

11

Reader’s toolkit

Decode a prevention claim in sixty seconds

Before changing behaviour or spending money, identify the design, comparator, outcome and absolute difference.

Headline language translated into evidence questions
The claim What may sit underneath it The question to ask
“Cuts risk by 30%” A relative association, a subgroup, or 7 cases versus 10—not a 30-point drop. What were the absolute risks, confidence interval and prespecified primary outcome?
“Reverses brain ageing” A small test-score change translated into “years,” often without disease outcomes. Was daily function or incident dementia actually measured?
“Grows the hippocampus” One imaging measure in a small sample; later pooled studies may disagree. Was the finding replicated, and did cognition differ between randomised groups?
“Boosts BDNF” A change in peripheral blood used as a proxy for events inside the brain. Does the biomarker mediate a meaningful human outcome?
“Clinically proven” Any statistically significant result, sometimes secondary or exploratory. Proven for this product, dose, population, outcome and duration?
“Synergistic” A bundled programme with no design capable of testing component interactions. Were ingredients varied independently in a factorial trial?
“Natural and safe” A supplement that can still interact, contaminate, duplicate or harm. Who should avoid it, what was tested, and who verified contents?

Ask who was missing. Results from resourced volunteers may not transfer to people facing frailty, poverty, disability or caregiving. Access is part of the intervention.

12

Questions worth asking

Practical answers without false certainty

Can lifestyle prevent Alzheimer’s disease?

No routine guarantees prevention. Healthy behaviours, clinical and sensory care may reduce average risk and improve health now, but lifestyle cannot fully control biological, genetic or age-related drivers.

Is the MIND diet better than an ordinary healthy diet?

Observational findings are promising, but in the major three-year randomised trial MIND did not significantly outperform an equally intensive healthy control diet with mild calorie restriction. Use Mediterranean or MIND ideas as flexible templates—not proprietary neurological prescriptions. Adequacy, affordability, culture and cardiometabolic needs matter.

Should I take omega-3, B vitamins or a multivitamin?

Not specifically to prevent dementia when no deficiency is diagnosed; WHO 2026 recommends against doing so. A clinician may recommend a nutrient for deficiency, pregnancy, malabsorption, restricted diets or another established indication. That is targeted treatment, not evidence that a supplement stack prevents cognitive disease.

Which exercise is best for the brain?

No optimal dementia-prevention type or dose is established. Combine aerobic, strength and balance activity in ways that suit health, ability and preference because the whole-body benefits are strong. Start small and build. A physiotherapist or other qualified professional can adapt movement for pain, disability, falls or complex conditions.

Are crosswords, languages or brain-training apps worthwhile?

Yes, for enjoyment, mastery and practice. Training improves the trained task; broad transfer and prevention are less certain. Evidence for one speed protocol does not apply to every puzzle or product.

When should memory change be assessed?

Arrange assessment when a change is persistent, worsening, noticed by others or interfering with familiar responsibilities, navigation, language, medication, money or safety. Sudden confusion or new neurological symptoms require urgent care. A professional can look for treatable contributors and decide whether formal cognitive testing is appropriate.

13

The honest conclusion

Protect the person, not a perfect score

There is no neuroplasticity master switch or recipe that makes dementia impossible. Protect vascular and metabolic health, preserve movement, eat nourishing food, avoid tobacco and harmful alcohol, address hearing and other needs, stay engaged, and build environments that make those actions possible.

Name the outcome. Healthy actions improve present wellbeing; some improve specific tests; multidomain programmes yield small composite-score gains in selected groups. None proves rejuvenation, guaranteed independence or dementia prevention.

A useful plan begins with the most important treatable need, makes one sustainable change, adds support and measures what matters in life. It leaves room for disability, culture, money, caregiving, enjoyment and uncertainty. It also leaves blame behind.

Important: This article provides general education and cannot diagnose cognitive change or replace personalised medical, nutrition, mental-health, sleep, hearing, vision or movement advice. Do not change prescribed medicines or begin intensive exercise or supplements on this basis alone. Seek urgent local care for sudden confusion, stroke-like symptoms or immediate safety concerns; seek qualified assessment for persistent or progressive change.
14

Evidence base

Sources and further reading

  1. WHO dementia fact sheet.
  2. Risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia: WHO guidelines, second edition.
  3. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 Lancet Commission.
  4. What is dementia? Symptoms, types and diagnosis.
  5. WHO recommendations and supporting evidence.
  6. Alcohol use and dementia risk: cohort and genetic analyses.
  7. ACHIEVE hearing intervention randomised trial.
  8. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour.
  9. Physical activity and cognitive decline: systematic review and meta-analysis.
  10. Exercise and cognition: umbrella review of randomised trials.
  11. Aerobic exercise and hippocampal volume: meta-analysis.
  12. EXERT randomised trial in adults with MCI.
  13. Exercise for preventing falls in community-dwelling older people.
  14. Mediterranean diet and age-related cognitive disorders: meta-analysis.
  15. Trial of the MIND diet for prevention of cognitive decline.
  16. Mediterranean diet and cognitive function: PREDIMED substudy.
  17. VITAL-Cog omega-3 randomised trial.
  18. COSMOS multivitamin supplementation and cognition.
  19. Practice guideline update: mild cognitive impairment.
  20. Ten-year effects of the ACTIVE cognitive training trial.
  21. ACTIVE claims-based dementia outcomes over 20 years.
  22. Do “brain-training” programmes work? Review.
  23. FTC action on unsupported Lumosity claims.
  24. Sleep duration in midlife and incident dementia.
  25. Sleep apnoea: symptoms and diagnosis.
  26. Mindfulness in subjective cognitive decline or MCI: meta-analysis.
  27. FINGER multidomain intervention randomised trial.
  28. US POINTER randomised clinical trial.
  29. LatAm-FINGERS randomised clinical trial.
  30. MAPT multidomain and omega-3 trial.
  31. preDIVA vascular-care cluster randomised trial.
  32. Multidomain interventions for dementia prevention: systematic review.
  33. FINGER cognition and engagement through long-term follow-up.
Back to blog