Collisions and Mergers: Drivers of Galactic Growth

Collisions and Mergers: Drivers of Galactic Growth

Knowledge Ark · Universe · Chapter 03 / Article 03

Collisions and mergers

When galaxies meet, gravity changes stellar orbits, gas finds new paths, and the encounter can leave traces that last for billions of years.

Tidal encountersGas and star formationGalactic growth
Two galaxies reshaped by gravity Conceptual view of two separate spiral galaxies with bright centers. Curving tidal tails and a diffuse bridge show material redistributed by their mutual gravity. Colors are illustrative; no stellar collision or explosion is depicted.
Conceptual illustration of two interacting galaxies, with extended tails and a bridge of material. The shapes, colors, and relative sizes are illustrative, not observations of a particular pair.
Stars change courseGravity alters stellar orbits; individual stars rarely collide directly.
Gas can compressShocks and gravitational torques change where gas gathers and where stars can form.
Outcomes varyAn encounter may remain a flyby or end in a merger, with many possible remnants.
A closer look at galaxies in motion

What happens when two galaxies meet?

Two bright centers, sweeping tails, a bridge of stars: an interacting pair can look as though it is being pulled apart and drawn together at once. In a gravitational sense, both are happening.

The previous article described galaxy shapes. Encounters help explain how some of those shapes change, and why a galaxy’s outskirts can preserve evidence that its bright center has already lost.

Here we follow the physical encounter: what moves, what can trigger new activity, and how astronomers reconstruct a process far too slow to watch from beginning to end.

One encounter, several kinds of matter

What does a galaxy collision actually mean?

Galaxies are mostly space between stars. When two overlap, direct star–star collisions are rare. Their collective gravity can nevertheless change the orbits of enormous numbers of stars.

An interaction is an encounter strong enough to affect the participants. A merger is the eventual combination into one galactic system. Some interactions are flybys: the galaxies distort one another and then separate.[2]

Stars

Orbits are rearranged

Different parts of a galaxy feel different pulls. These tidal forces can draw stars into tails, bridges, and more diffuse outer structures.

Gas

Flows can shock and cool

Gas streams can interact hydrodynamically, heating in shocks and radiating energy. Some regions compress; others become more turbulent or disperse.

Dark matter

The larger system responds

Extended halos interact gravitationally and absorb part of the orbital energy. The galaxies inside them can remain distinct after their halos begin sharing one system.

Tidal torques also redistribute angular momentum—the motion associated with rotation and orbiting. An encounter can distort a stellar disk into a bar or other asymmetric structure that helps gas move inward, while other material moves outward.[4], [19]

A foundational insight

In 1972, Alar and Juri Toomre showed how gravitational encounters could generate bridges and tails resembling those seen around peculiar galaxies. Their models made a persuasive physical case for interpreting many of these features as tidal structures.[1]

A bound pair can pass more than once before combining

How can an encounter become a merger?

A moving galaxy raises a gravitational wake in surrounding matter. That wake pulls back on it, transferring energy from its orbit into motions within the larger system. This process, dynamical friction, can help a bound pair move toward coalescence.[3]

The illustrations show one possible sequence. They are schematic stages of a bound encounter, not equally spaced snapshots or a prediction for every pair.

An approaching pair Two well-separated disk galaxies illustrate the approach in one possible bound encounter.
01 · Approach

The galaxies begin to disturb one another

Their extended gravitational fields interact before the bright stellar bodies strongly overlap. The orbit and disk orientations affect the response.

After a first close passage The galaxy centers are separated again after passing one another. Tidal tails and a faint bridge trace the gravitational disturbance.
02 · First close passage

Tails and bridges begin to develop

The centers can separate again after passing. Material drawn outward may remain bound, return later, or escape.

A renewed close approach The two distinct bright centers approach again in an overlapping field of disturbed stars and gas. This is a possible stage of a bound merger, not a universal orbit.
03 · Renewed approach

Orbital energy is redistributed

If the pair remains bound and its orbit decays sufficiently, the centers return toward one another. Further passages can alter the gas and stellar structure.

A remnant with lingering debris A single bright center is surrounded by a diffuse stellar body, faint outer debris and residual disk structure. The final shape depends on the encounter and its gas supply.
04 · Coalescence and settling

A remnant emerges

The stellar systems combine, while outer debris can remain visible. The illustrated remnant retains disk structure; other outcomes are possible.

The changing gravitational field redistributes stellar orbital energies during violent relaxation. “Violent” refers to this rapid dynamical change, not to stars repeatedly striking one another.[19]

How long does the process take?

A substantial encounter can unfold over hundreds of millions to several billion years, depending on which stages are counted. Orbit, mass ratio, halo structure, and mass loss all matter.

A small satellite may survive for much longer, or be disrupted before its center reaches the host’s center. A halo merger and a galaxy merger therefore do not share one universal timescale.[3]

Mass contrast and gas supply describe different aspects of an encounter

What do major, minor, wet, and dry mean?

These labels help compare encounters without assuming that they all produce the same result. The mass ratio describes the participants; gas content describes an important part of the physics available to them.

Two ways to describe the same merger
Category What it means What it can change
Major merger Comparable masses; a common boundary is a smaller-to-larger stellar mass ratio of about 1:4. Both galaxies’ stellar structures and gas flows can be strongly affected.
Minor merger A more unequal mass ratio, below the study’s chosen major-merger threshold. The smaller galaxy can be stripped, adding stars to the host’s outskirts or other components.
Gas-rich, or “wet” A substantial supply of cold gas participates in the encounter. Cooling, star formation, and the survival or rebuilding of a disk become important.
Gas-poor, or “dry” Relatively little cold gas is available. Existing stars can be redistributed and added with limited new star formation.

The 1:4 division is a convention. Studies may use different thresholds, compare stellar or total mass, and measure those masses at different stages. Those choices should be checked before comparing merger counts.[5]

A major merger can be gas-poor, and a minor merger can carry useful fresh gas. Mass ratio alone cannot tell us whether a starburst will occur or what the remnant will look like.[4]

An encounter changes where gas can become dense

Why do some mergers trigger starbursts?

Gravitational torques can help gas transfer angular momentum to the rest of the system and move inward. Compression in disks and interacting gas streams can also build dense regions away from the center.

A starburst occurs when star formation becomes unusually intense compared with an appropriate reference population. The response depends on gas supply, internal structure, orbital geometry, and encounter stage. A large enhancement is possible, but it is not the standard outcome of every merger.[2], [8]

In a detailed simulation designed to resemble the Antennae, early star formation was spatially extended, while a later modeled burst was more centrally concentrated. This illustrates why looking only at a galactic nucleus can miss part of the response.[9]

Dust absorbs some of the light from young stars and reradiates it in the infrared. Infrared observations can therefore uncover activity hidden in optical images. An active nucleus can heat dust too, so spectra and other diagnostics are needed to separate the power sources.[10]

Delivering gas to the center is one part of a longer journey

Can a merger switch on an active galactic nucleus?

Gas reaching a galaxy’s inner region can provide fuel for its central supermassive black hole. It still has to shed further angular momentum before reaching the much smaller accretion flow. An encounter can help start that transport without guaranteeing that the black hole becomes active.[4]

When accretion releases substantial radiation, the central region is an active galactic nucleus, or AGN. Quasars are especially luminous examples. The observable light comes from matter around the black hole, before it crosses the event horizon.

What surveys can establish

A statistical connection

Some post-merger samples show a higher incidence of AGN than comparable undisturbed galaxies. The size of the excess depends on how the active nuclei are selected, including optical, infrared, and radio criteria.[11]

What changes the comparison

Luminosity and obscuration

A 2026 study of type 2 AGN found the strongest association with tidal features among systems that were both luminous and heavily dust-obscured. That result describes its selected population, rather than a universal rule for every AGN.[12]

An active nucleus and tidal tails in the same image establish that the phenomena coexist. Inferring how the encounter affected accretion requires population comparisons, timing constraints, and physical models.

Radiation, winds, and jets from some active systems can heat or displace gas. Whether that feedback produces a sustained decline in star formation depends on how effectively the energy couples to the gas and whether fresh fuel arrives later. The article on AGN and quasars follows this connection in more detail.

The aftermath often lasts longer than the brightest activity

How do astronomers recognize an encounter?

Tidal tails and bridges show material stretched or transferred during an interaction. Shells and stellar streams can preserve debris from an accreted companion. These structures carry information about an encounter’s orbit and the distribution of mass.[1], [19]

Two bright centers are another clue, but apparent proximity on the sky is not enough. Redshifts and velocity measurements help distinguish a physical pair from unrelated galaxies projected along the same line of sight. A faint tail can also disappear below an image’s detection limit.[5]

An ongoing interaction

The Antennae

NGC 4038 and NGC 4039 show distorted stellar structures, long tails, dust, and many young star clusters.

The system makes the different responses visible together: gravity stretches the galaxies, while dense gas supports new generations of stars.[14]

A merger remnant

NGC 7252

Its merged central body and extended debris preserve evidence of an earlier major encounter.

A small rotating gas disk remains in the center. The remnant illustrates how organized motion and new structure can coexist with the aftermath of a merger.[15]

Disruption close to home

The Sagittarius dwarf

This satellite is being tidally stripped by the Milky Way. Its trailing stars reveal an ongoing process of disruption and assimilation.

A galaxy can therefore acquire material gradually, with a smaller companion leaving debris while it is still being dismantled.[16]

Different wavelengths add different clues. Starlight maps visible structure; dust and gas observations reveal obscured activity and fuel; spectra measure motion and chemical properties. A convincing reconstruction uses these views together.

A shared remnant can retain a complicated history

Does every merger produce a quiet elliptical?

A major encounter can rearrange stellar orbits into a more spheroidal distribution. It can also leave part of a disk intact, or allow a new disk to form from gas that retains sufficient angular momentum. The gas fraction and encounter geometry help determine the outcome.[4]

Minor mergers often add stars to outer structures, while also disturbing the host’s disk. Repeated events can contribute substantially to growth, but “minor” describes a mass ratio rather than a guarantee of negligible change.

Some debris remains bound and returns. Other material disperses far from the bright remnant. A galaxy’s outskirts can therefore record past encounters long after its center looks relatively settled.[19]

The surroundings matter too. Slower encounters in groups can favor gravitational capture. In rich clusters, high relative speeds often turn encounters into flybys. A crowded environment is not automatically the easiest place for two galaxies to merge.[7]

A snapshot becomes a history only after the selection effects are understood

How important are mergers across cosmic time?

A merger fraction is the proportion of a sample identified as merging. A merger rate estimates how many events occur per galaxy per unit time. Moving from one to the other requires an estimate of how long the selected features remain recognizable.

Close-pair searches, tidal-feature searches, and post-merger classifications select different stages. Their sensitivity also changes with mass ratio, image depth, and redshift, so raw counts cannot simply be compared as though they were interchangeable.[5]

Many studies and simulations find more mergers per galaxy per unit time at earlier epochs, but the trend depends on which galaxies and encounters are counted. There is no single established redshift at which every definition of the merger rate peaks.[6]

A future encounter still being calculated

Will the Milky Way merge with Andromeda?

A merger remains a possible future, often nicknamed “Milkomeda.” Its likelihood depends on the galaxies’ measured motions and masses, along with the gravitational influence of neighbors such as the Large Magellanic Cloud and M33.

A 2025 analysis and a 2026 follow-up produced different probabilities under different motion estimates. This is an evolving forecast, rather than a certain appointment for a collision.[17], [18]

Why have the published probabilities changed?

The 2025 calculation found roughly an even chance of a Milky Way–Andromeda merger within the next 10 billion years. The 2026 study favored about 90% in its preferred model after revising the adopted motions.

The latter study still emphasized that small uncertainties in those motions substantially change the outcome. These probabilities describe particular models and inputs; better measurements are needed for a firm forecast.[17], [18]

Throughout cosmic history, mergers have worked alongside gas accretion and star formation between encounters. Following all of those contributions is how astronomers connect individual collisions to the wider story of hierarchical growth.

What an encounter leaves behind

New paths for matter. Lasting clues in the stars.

A galaxy encounter can stretch existing stars into tails, gather gas into new star-forming regions, and alter the conditions around a central black hole. Its outcome depends on the participants and the route they take.

The next article widens the view to galaxy clusters and superclusters, exploring how the larger environment connects these individual histories.

Sources and further reading

Research papers and official observatory descriptions supporting the physics, examples, and forecasts discussed here. The illustrations show a possible encounter, not measured snapshots or a fixed timetable.

  1. Toomre & Toomre (1972) — Galactic Bridges and TailsFoundational gravitational models explaining tidal structures in interacting galaxies.
  2. Bournaud (2011) — Star formation in galaxy interactions and mergersEncounter dynamics, gas flows, and the varied response of star formation.
  3. Boylan-Kolchin, Ma & Quataert (2008) — Dynamical Friction and Galaxy Merging TimescalesOrbital decay, mass ratios, and the delay between halo assembly and galaxy coalescence.
  4. Hopkins et al. (2009) — How Do Disks Survive Mergers?Gas transport and the conditions under which disks survive or form again.
  5. Lotz et al. (2011) — The Major and Minor Galaxy Merger Rates at z < 1.5Mass-ratio conventions, observability times, and the conversion from merger fractions to rates.
  6. Rodriguez-Gomez et al. (2015) — The merger rate of galaxies in the Illustris Simulation: a comparison with observations and semi-empirical modelsHow inferred merger rates depend on galaxy mass, mass ratio, epoch, and measurement choices.
  7. Makino & Hut (1997) — Merger Rate of Equal-Mass Spherical GalaxiesThe importance of relative velocity for gravitational capture in different environments.
  8. Ellison et al. (2013) — Galaxy pairs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey VIII: The observational properties of post-merger galaxiesStar formation and nuclear activity in a selected sample of pairs and merger remnants.
  9. Renaud, Bournaud & Duc (2015) — A parsec-resolution simulation of the Antennae galaxies: Formation of star clusters during the mergerA model linking extended and central star formation to different encounter stages.
  10. Petric et al. (2011) — Mid-Infrared Spectral Diagnostics of Luminous Infrared GalaxiesSeparating stellar and active-nucleus contributions to infrared emission.
  11. Bickley et al. (2023) — AGN in post-mergers from UNIONSThe merger–AGN connection and its dependence on how active nuclei are selected.
  12. Yoon et al. (2026) — Only obscured yet luminous active galactic nuclei are closely associated with galaxy mergersA type 2 AGN study separating the roles of luminosity and dust obscuration; accepted by Astronomy & Astrophysics.
  13. Ellison et al. (2022) — Galaxy mergers can rapidly shut down star formationEvidence for rapid declines in star formation in part of the post-merger population.
  14. NASA / Hubble — The Antennae Galaxies, NGC 4038–4039An interacting pair with tidal structures and many young star clusters.
  15. ESO — NGC 7252: a galactic collision and its surviving central gas diskA merger remnant whose central gas still shows organized rotation.
  16. ESA / Gaia — Milky Way companion galaxies and their orbitsSatellite dynamics and the ongoing disruption of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy.
  17. Sawala et al. (2025) — No certainty of a Milky Way–Andromeda collisionA future-orbit calculation including neighboring galaxies and measurement uncertainties.
  18. Wu et al. (2026) — The Fate of the Milky Way–Andromeda System: To Merge or Not?A revised calculation favoring a higher merger probability while emphasizing uncertainty in measured motions.
  19. Barnes & Hernquist (1992) — Dynamics of Interacting GalaxiesOrbital energy, angular momentum, and the physical evolution of merging systems.
All articles in this chapter
  1. Dark Matter Halos: Galactic Foundations
  2. Hubble’s Galaxy Classification: Spiral, Elliptical, Irregular
  3. Collisions and Mergers: Drivers of Galactic Growth — you are here
  4. Galaxy Clusters and Superclusters
  5. Spiral Arms and Barred Galaxies
  6. Elliptical Galaxies: Formation and Features
  7. Irregular Galaxies: Chaos and Starbursts
  8. Evolutionary Paths: Secular vs. Merger-Driven
  9. Active Galactic Nuclei and Quasars
  10. Galactic Futures: Milkomeda and Beyond
Back to blog